Elsevier

Biological Conservation

Volume 143, Issue 8, August 2010, Pages 1891-1900
Biological Conservation

Immediate behavioural responses of humans and Asian elephants in the context of road traffic in southern India

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2010.04.043Get rights and content

Abstract

With expanding human populations, exponentially increasing motor vehicles, and public roads running through Protected Areas, road traffic is becoming an increasing concern in many countries. While studies have traditionally examined the role of highways in fragmenting and decimating animal populations, we carried out one of the first studies of the immediate behavioural responses, rather than inferring eventual consequences, of motorists and wildlife towards each other. We inspected variables such as vehicle size, type, and origin, and elephant group composition, amongst others, to study motorist–elephant responses along highways in Mudumalai Wildlife Sanctuary, southern India. Based on 1521 motorist–elephant interactions, we found higher odds of more severe to less severe motorist response in passenger (versus goods) vehicles, visiting (versus local) vehicles, and in vehicles of particular size classes. Overall, elephant responses to vehicles increased in severity with increasing vehicle size and motorist response. Although motorists in heavy vehicles caused the least disturbance, elephants were most affected by heavy vehicles (because of their size) and generally tolerated smaller vehicles, even those that created significant disturbance. We suggest that an understanding of sensory biases of animals is important in the management of human–wildlife conflict as these could lead to the outcome of interactions being contrary to expectation. This is also one of the first uses of ordinal multinomial generalized linear models to studies of human–wildlife conflict, and we suggest its application to the data often obtained in this field.

Introduction

Highways in various regions of the world have been linked to declines in animal density (for example, Fahrig et al., 1995, Reijnen et al., 1995), mortality of various taxa (for example, Davies et al., 1987, Groot Bruinderink and Hazebroek, 1996; see Trombulak and Frissell, 2000), and creation of barriers to movement between habitat patches (for example, McLellan and Shackleton, 1988, Mace et al., 1996, Forman and Alexander, 1998, Rondinini and Doncaster, 2002, Shepard et al., 2008). Human–wildlife conflict due to vehicular movement is an increasing concern in India, a country with abundant biodiversity, a human population of over one billion, and only about 4.7% of its land area classified as “Protected Areas” for wildlife (National Forest Commission, 2006). With roads running through Protected Areas and a trebling of the number of motor vehicles in India since 1990 (Pucher et al., 2007), the need for reconciling economic growth and wildlife protection on India’s highways has perhaps never been greater.

While studies of the effect of road traffic on wildlife have tended to focus on mortality of wildlife or fragmentation of habitat, little attention has been paid to immediate behavioural responses of motorists and wildlife. Studies of behavioural responses of wildlife have focused more on the response of wildlife to roads, such as avoidance of roads (for example, McLellan and Shackleton, 1988, Brody and Pelton, 1989, Barnes et al., 1991, Klein, 1991, Blake et al., 2008) or decreased utilization of surrounding areas (Van der Zande et al., 1980, Madsen, 1985), than actual interaction with motorists. Studies of immediate behavioural responses to road traffic by wildlife are few and have usually been in the context of traffic collisions with ungulates, which pose a grave problem to road-safety in the United States, Europe, and Japan (Waring et al., 1991; see Groot Bruinderink and Hazebroek, 1996). While there is significant mortality of animals from road traffic in India (Dhindsa et al., 1988, Boominathan, 1999, Vijayakumar et al., 2001), mortality of large mammals is not as common as in the United States or Europe since the topography and relatively narrow roads through forests prohibit high driving speeds, which are an important cause of collisions (Pojar et al., 1975, Case, 1978). We were more interested in how motorists and animals respond to each other behaviourally when they encounter each other since this would offer significant input to management from the point of view of raising awareness amongst motorists as well as reducing disturbance to wildlife and preventing traffic collisions with them. For instance, an understanding of the disturbance created by different types of motorists (locals versus visitors, passengers versus goods, and in a range of group sizes using vehicles of different sizes) would allow for a targeted awareness programme. Similarly, an understanding of what animals are disturbed by, such as motorist action, vehicle size, and distance to which they are approached, under different circumstances, such as the animal’s group composition and whether it has had access to water/forage, would allow us to make informed decisions about the levels of traffic permissible and their management, spatially and temporally.

The present study focused on Asian elephants (Elephas maximus) because they are wide-ranging animals that frequently encounter roadways and vehicular traffic. Requiring the use of large areas, elephants are expected to be affected to a great degree by habitat fragmentation. Being charismatic megafauna, they are also expected to elicit strong responses from motorists. On the other hand, their size and strength allow them to retaliate to some extent towards road traffic, making them an ideal species for studying motorist–wildlife interactions. In addition, Asian elephants are not the most behaviourally sensitive of species to human influence and share habitats with humans in several areas. Therefore, their behavioural response would serve as a minimum disturbance scenario, with many other species probably being affected to a greater degree. In this study, we wanted to find out how different categories of motorists behaved towards elephants, what determined the responses of elephants towards motorists, and to test if these responses from elephants were directly related to motorist behaviour. We predicted that passenger vehicles would create more disturbance than goods vehicles and visitors more than locals, and that elephant response would reflect motorist response.

Section snippets

Study area

The study was carried out in Mudumalai Wildlife Sanctuary (now Mudumalai Tiger Reserve) (11°31′N–11°39′N, 76°27′E–76°43′E; area of 321 km2; altitude of 850–1250 m above mean sea level), which is located centrally in the Nilgiris-Eastern Ghats landscape in southern India. The reserve is home to Asian elephants in one of the highest densities recorded (∼2 elephants/km2) and is believed to have a high conservation value (AERCC, 1998). The reserve, which lies in the state of Tamil Nadu and is

Behavioural response of motorists

A total of 1521 motorist–elephant interactions were observed during the study period based on 76 sightings (379 individuals; these were the number of individuals that came out towards the road but it is possible that these groups had more elephants that were still further into the forest and thus not visible at the time of observation) of elephant groups. We observed an average of 4.6 (SD = 5.51) interactions per hour of field effort. The number of motorists elephants interacted with per hour on

Elephant response

While it is known that various large animals such as grizzly bears (McLellan and Shackleton, 1988), black bears (Brody and Pelton, 1989), caribou (Klein, 1991), and African forest elephants (Barnes et al., 1991, Blake et al., 2008) avoid roads, and that elephants in our study site avoided highways during the daytime (Boominathan, 1999), this is one of the few studies that examined immediate behavioural responses to land-, water-, or air-borne vehicles. Previous studies on immediate behavioural

Acknowledgments

We are grateful to the Animal and Plant Conservation Division, Chester Zoo, North of England Zoological Society for funding the field study. We thank the Tamil Nadu Forest Department for a research permit and R. Dogra, I.F.S., wildlife warden of Mudumalai Wildlife Sanctuary, and other forest department officials and staff for their support. VT was hosted at the Indian Institute of Science Field Research Station in Masinagudi during the field study. R. Arumugam, C. Arivazhagan, and C. M.

References (38)

  • A.J. Brody et al.

    Effects of roads on black bear movements in western North Carolina

    Wildlife Society Bulletin

    (1989)
  • R.M. Case

    Interstate highway road killed animals: a data source for biologists

    Wildlife Society Bulletin

    (1978)
  • J.M. Davies et al.

    Seasonal distribution of road kills in the European badger (Meles meles)

    Journal of Zoology (London)

    (1987)
  • M.S. Dhindsa et al.

    Roadside birds in Punjab (India): relation to mortality from vehicles

    Environmental Conservation

    (1988)
  • R.T.T. Forman et al.

    Roads and their major ecological effects

    Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics

    (1998)
  • S.D. Gavin et al.

    Do pronghorn (Antilocapra americana) perceive roads as a predation risk?

    Canadian Journal of Zoology

    (2006)
  • M.I. Goldstein et al.

    Mountain goat response to helicopter overflights in Alaska

    Wildlife Society Bulletin

    (2005)
  • G.W.T.A. Groot Bruinderink et al.

    Ungulate traffic collisions in Europe

    Conservation Biology

    (1996)
  • M. Krishnan

    An ecological survey of the larger mammals of peninsular India: the Indian elephant

    Journal of the Bombay Natural History Society

    (1972)
  • Cited by (0)

    View full text