Elsevier

Estuarine, Coastal and Shelf Science

Volume 184, 5 January 2017, Pages 102-114
Estuarine, Coastal and Shelf Science

Plankton bioindicators of environmental conditions in coastal lagoons

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecss.2016.10.045Get rights and content

Highlights

  • We identify two distinct plankton communities in the Coorong.

  • Salinity and nutrient are major factors shaping the communities.

  • We identify two sets of positive and negative indicator species.

  • We provide a tool for managing ecosystem health states of coastal lagoons.

Abstract

Coastal lagoons are characterised by strong spatial gradient of environmental parameters, especially hypersalinity, and are prone to anthropogenic disturbance. The Coorong (South Australia) is an inverse estuarine coastal lagoon separated from the sea by sand dunes. It is exposed to extreme water quality changes that affect its aquatic communities. Here, we used plankton as indicators of extreme environmental fluctuations to monitor and manage the environmental health of such complex systems. We defined the relationship of different plankton communities with water quality fluctuations and determined plankton species suitable for monitoring the ecosystem health. Two distinct communities of phytoplankton and zooplankton were identified, with salinity and nutrients being the principal factors impacting species distribution. Thus, two sets of indicator species were selected based on the different communities observed. Polychaete and gastropod larvae were positive indicators, showing salinity range restriction of brackish to marine. The distribution Acartia cf. fancetti represented healthy hypersaline conditions (salinity 40–60), while Cyclophora sp. and Scrippsiella sp. were negative indicators, correlating with extreme salinity and ammonia levels. The implementation of planktonic organisms as environmental indicators provided a constructive tool for the management of ecosystem health of the Coorong and will be applicable to similar coastal lagoons.

Introduction

A number of comprehensive and multidisciplinary studies (Lasserre and Marzollo, 2000, Roselli et al., 2013, Giménez et al., 2014, Coelho et al., 2015) have shown that the ecology of coastal lagoons is highly variable, depending on the prevalent physical and chemical environment. In particular, tidal to wind-driven water movements and strong spatial gradients of environmental parameters can be observed (Lamptey and Armah, 2008, Leterme et al., 2015). Coastal lagoons are prone to anthropogenic interference and disturbance by agricultural drainage, discharge of sewage or change in hydrology, thus modifying their structure and function (Brehmer et al., 2013, Dhib et al., 2013, Leterme et al., 2015). Such modifications, coupled with climatic variations, affect the overall ecosystem health and environmental gradients of specific coastal lagoons (Lester and Fairweather, 2009; Paul et al., 2016), therefore causing stress and changes in communities of resident species (Paul et al., 2016). The active interaction of climatic and anthropogenic stressors presents a serious challenge in terms of managing and predicting the water quality and ecosystem health of estuaries and coastal lagoons.

Plankton communities are often used as bioindicators to monitor ecological change in aquatic systems (Paul et al., 2016, Lemley et al., 2016) and are considered good natural bioindicators due to their rapid response to fluctuating environmental conditions (Livingston et al., 2002, Albaina et al., 2009, Amengual-Morro et al., 2012). In particular, phytoplankton populations reflect climate variability and dramatic changes that occur in aquatic ecosystems (Edwards and Richardson, 2004, Richardson and Schoeman, 2004, Leterme et al., 2005). Similarly, zooplankton communities are considered ideal bioindicators for estuarine conditions as they have the potential to remain in the water body of appropriate water quality (Wilson, 1994, Albaina et al., 2009). Assessing plankton dynamics is, therefore, of particular importance when considering the impact of environmental variability on ecological changes of coastal lagoons, that are amongst the most productive and dynamic habitats on earth (Alongi, 1998, Gönenç and Wolflin, 2005). However, fundamental information on how climatic variability affects population dynamics, abundance and taxonomy in those environments is still relatively limited (Anthony et al., 2009, Hall et al., 2013).

The Coorong lagoon (South Australia) is one of Australia's most important wetland areas and a RAMSAR listed wetland. It is known to have a high biological diversity, supporting a wide variety of local and migrating shore birds, fish populations, planktonic organisms, benthic macroinvertebrate populations and flora (Zampatti et al., 2010, Paton and Bailey, 2011, 2012; Shiel and Tan, 2013, Dittmann et al., 2015, Leterme et al., 2015). The Coorong is a long, narrow coastal lagoon at the mouth of Australia's largest river system, the Murray-Darling Basin (MDB). This shallow water system is connected to the sea at the mouth of the River Murray (Murray Mouth), which is subject to infilling and scouring on a seasonal basis. Unlike most estuaries, freshwater input from the MDB occurs close to the estuary mouth, and is primarily drawn along through the Coorong by salinity-driven gradients in response to evaporative water loss (Webster, 2010). The Coorong lagoon is a complex system as it also exhibits inverse estuarine characteristics, whereby evaporation exceeds the freshwater input (Pritchard, 1952; Lester and Fairweather, 2009). Moreover, salinity is higher at the head of the system than at the mouth (Leterme et al., 2015; Lester and Fairweather, 2009). The salinity levels of the Coorong have increased dramatically between 2004 and 2010 (>90) because of the lack of water inflow due to the increased retainment of water further up the Murray river (Nayar and Loo, 2009), but also due to the drought (2004–2010; Zampatti et al., 2010). Since 2010, however, there has been a substantial increase in freshwater release into the Coorong and the connectivity to the sea has improved. This resulted in a change of fauna and flora communities as clearly shown by Paton and Bailey (2014), Dittmann et al., 2015, Leterme et al., 2015.

Few studies have looked at the spatial distribution of planktonic organisms in hypersaline inverse estuaries such as the Coorong (Silva et al., 2009) and, therefore, relatively less is known compared to that in positive estuaries. Moreover, few studies have explored the use of planktonic organisms as ecosystem health and environmental variability indicator in such systems. Understanding and modelling the dynamics of an aquatic system without knowledge of its base of productivity is often not possible (Jaanus et al., 2009). In this study, we identify potential planktonic indicator species suitable for monitoring and managing environmental variability and health of ecosystems such as inverse estuaries. To achieve this, we study the spatial and temporal changes in plankton communities along the Coorong (phytoplankton and zooplankton) and look at their relation to environmental variability, also providing the first account of the zooplankton populations of the hypersaline part of the system. We hypothesise a significant decrease in the number of plankton species and the presence of a different plankton community in the hypersaline region. We identify the main water quality parameters that influence the plankton dynamics of the system and then categorise suitable species to serve as indicators of water quality variability and ecosystem health following the criteria given by Hilty and Merenlender, 2000, Carignan and Villard, 2002 and Siddig et al. (2016).

Section snippets

Study area

The Coorong is a shallow (<2 m) and narrow (<4 km) coastal lagoon over 110 km in length (Fig. 1). It is divided into two main lagoons, the North lagoon (NL) and the South lagoon (SL), and present an estuarine area around the mouth of the Murray River. The North and South lagoons are separated by a narrow and shallow channel at Parnka Point. The Coorong is separated from the Southern Ocean by peninsular dunes, except at the Murray Mouth where marine water enters the system by tidal action.

Environmental parameters

Environmental parameters showed strong spatial gradients along the length of the Coorong and temporal changes across seasons.

Overall, all location (GC, NL and SL) were significantly different in terms of environmental parameter characteristics throughout the year (PERMANOVA, p < 0.01). Water temperature showed significant temporal variation (Kruskal-Walis, p < 0.05), while pH was only significantly lower in November and December 2013 in SL (Kruskal-Walis, p < 0.05). Salinity varied from 0.49

Environmental parameters

This study showed strong spatial and temporal differences in water quality in the Coorong and Goolwa Channel. Salinity gradually increased in NL with sharp increases around S4 towards SL. Those changes in salinity are related to freshwater input from the barrages, freshwater from Salt Creek, tidal action and evaporation (Webster, 2005, Webster, 2010). The volume of freshwater input varies significantly on a seasonal basis (Fig. 2), especially in the more saline sites of SL, where considerably

Conclusion

In this study, a comprehensive description of the plankton communities in relation to environmental parameters of the Coorong, South Australia was provided. The water quality of the system was found to be highly influential on the community structure, creating two distinct communities. Phytoplankton community was mostly dominated by diatoms in SL. On the other hand, zooplankton communities between the GC, NL and SL were less distinct. The distribution of zooplankton was also influenced by

Acknowledgements

Funding was supported by the Australian Research Council (DP110101679) and by the Scholarship of Deevesh Hemraj from the National Centre of Excellence in Desalination Australia. Sampling was done under the sampling permit G25583 of the Department of Environment, Water and National Resources (DEWNR). We would like to acknowledge SA Water for giving us access to the barrages. Special thanks to Mr. David Short, Dr. Russell Shiel and Mr. Louis Thirot for their help during the study.

References (98)

  • L. Giménez et al.

    Macrofaunal patterns and animal–sediment relationships in Uruguayan estuaries and coastal lagoons (Atlantic coast of South America)

    J. Sea Res.

    (2014)
  • N.S. Hall et al.

    Effects of climatic variability on phytoplankton community structure and bloom development in the eutrophic, microtidal, New River Estuary, North Carolina, USA

    Estuar. Coast. Shelf Sci.

    (2013)
  • L. Haraguchi et al.

    Long-term changes of the phytoplankton community and biomass in the subtropical shallow Patos Lagoon Estuary, Brazil

    Estuar. Coast. Shelf Sci.

    (2015)
  • J. Hilty et al.

    Faunal indicator taxa selection for monitoring ecosystem health

    Biol. Conserv.

    (2000)
  • J. Jendyk et al.

    Environmental variability and phytoplankton dynamics in a South Australian inverse estuary

    Cont. Shelf Res.

    (2014)
  • R.E. Lester et al.

    Modelling future conditions in the degraded semi-arid estuary of Australia's largest river using ecosystem states

    Estuar. Coast. Shelf. Sci.

    (2009)
  • S.C. Leterme et al.

    Drought conditions and recovery in the Coorong wetland, south Australia in 1997–2013

    Estuar. Coast. Shelf Sci.

    (2015)
  • R.J. Livingston et al.

    Effects of ammonia in pulp mill effluents on estuarine phytoplankton assemblages: field descriptive and experimental results

    Aquat. Bot.

    (2002)
  • I.D. Marsden et al.

    Gastropod growth and survival as bioindicators of stress associated with high nutrients in the intertidal of a shallow temperate estuary

    Estuar. Coast. Shelf Sci.

    (2015)
  • M. Milione et al.

    The effects of temperature and salinity on population growth and egg hatching success of the tropical calanoid copepod, Acartia sinjiensis

    Aquaculture

    (2008)
  • F.A. Nche-Fambo et al.

    Resilience of estuarine phytoplankton and their temporal variability along salinity gradients during drought and hypersalinity

    Estuar. Coast. Shelf Sci.

    (2015)
  • R.A. Nunes-Vaz

    The salinity response of an inverse estuary to climate change & desalination

    Estuar. Coast. Shelf Sci.

    (2012)
  • J.C. Ogden et al.

    Waterbirds as indicators of ecosystem health in the coastal marine habitats of southern Florida: 1. Selection and justification for a suite of indicator species

    Ecol. Indic.

    (2014)
  • C.L. Ohs et al.

    Viability of subitaneous eggs of the copepod, Acartia tonsa (Dana), following exposure to various cryoprotectants and hypersaline water

    Aquaculture

    (2009)
  • Y.J. Pan et al.

    Effects of salinity on the reproductive performance of Apocyclops royi (Copepoda, Cyclopoida)

    J. Exp. Mar. Biol. Ecol.

    (2016)
  • S. Paul et al.

    Evaluation of abiotic stresses of temperate estuaries by using resident zooplankton: a community vs. population approach

    Estuar. Coast. Shelf Sci.

    (2016)
  • D.W. Pritchard

    Estuarine hydrography

    Adv. Geophys.

    (1952)
  • L. Roselli et al.

    Do physiography and hydrology determine the physico-chemical properties and trophic status of coastal lagoons? A comparative approach

    Estuar. Coast. Shelf Sci.

    (2013)
  • A.A. Siddig et al.

    How do ecologists select and use indicator species to monitor ecological change? Insights from 14 years of publication in Ecological Indicators

    Ecol. Indic.

    (2016)
  • M. Simier et al.

    Spatial and temporal structure of fish assemblages in an “inverse estuary”, the Sine Saloum system (Senegal)

    Estuar. Coast. Shelf Sci.

    (2004)
  • L. Svetlichny et al.

    Salinity tolerance of alien copepods Acartia tonsa and Oithona davisae in the Black Sea

    J. Exp. Mar. Biol. Ecol.

    (2014)
  • I.T. Webster

    The hydrodynamics and salinity regime of a coastal lagoon–The Coorong, Australia–Seasonal to multi-decadal timescales

    Estuar. Coast. Shelf Sci.

    (2010)
  • A. Yáñez-Arancibia et al.

    Ecosystem functioning: the basis for restoration and management of a tropical coastal lagoon, Pacific coast of Mexico

    Ecol. Eng.

    (2014)
  • A. Albaina et al.

    Zooplankton communities in two contrasting Basque estuaries (1999–2001): reporting changes associated with ecosystem health

    J. Plankton Res.

    (2009)
  • Daniel M. Alongi

    "Sources, sinks, and export of organic carbon through a tropical, semi-enclosed delta (Hinchinbrook Channel, Australia)."

    Mangroves Salt Marshes

    (1998)
  • C. Amengual-Morro et al.

    Phytoplankton as bioindicator for waste stabilization ponds

    J. Environ. Manag.

    (2012)
  • M.J. Anderson et al.

    PERMANOVAþ for PRIMER. Guide to Software and Statistical Methods

    (2008)
  • A. Anthony et al.

    Coastal Lagoons and Climate Change: Ecological and Social Ramifications in the US Atlantic and Gulf Coast Ecosystems

    (2009)
  • S. Badylak et al.

    Spatial and temporal patterns of phytoplankton composition in subtropical coastal lagoon, the Indian River Lagoon, Florida, USA

    J. plankton Res.

    (2004)
  • S. Ban

    Effect of temperature and food concentration on post-embryonic development, egg production and adult body size of calanoid copepod Eurytemora affinis

    J. Plankton Res.

    (1994)
  • I.A. Bayly

    Non-marine Centropagidae (Copepoda: Calanoida) of the World

    (1992)
  • M.A. Brock et al.

    The composition of aquatic communities in saline wetlands in Western Australia

    Hydrobiologia

    (1983)
  • V. Carignan et al.

    Selecting indicator species to monitor ecological integrity: a review

    Environ. Monit. Assess.

    (2002)
  • D.R. Clark et al.

    The large capacity for dark nitrate-assimilation in diatoms may overcome nitrate limitation of growth

    New Phytol.

    (2002)
  • K.R. Clarke et al.

    PRIMER V6: User Manual/Tutorial

    (2006)
  • R.B. Domingues et al.

    Are nutrients and light limiting summer phytoplankton in a temperate coastal lagoon?

    Aquat. Ecol.

    (2015)
  • M. Dufrene et al.

    Species assemblages and indicator species: the need for a flexible asymmetrical approach

    Ecol. Monogr.

    (1997)
  • H.J. Dumont

    The Caspian Lake: history, biota, structure, and function

    Limnol. Oceanogr.

    (1998)
  • E.G. Durbin et al.

    Food limitation of production by adult Acartia tonsa in Narragansett Bay, Rhode Island1

    Limnol. Oceanogr.

    (1983)
  • Cited by (54)

    • Biochemical response and metals bioaccumulation in planktonic communities from marine areas impacted by the Fundão mine dam rupture (southeast Brazil)

      2022, Science of the Total Environment
      Citation Excerpt :

      Our comparison with bioaccumulation of metals in zooplankton samples collected before the arrival of the mud in the coastal zone showed that the environmental contamination is still high. The use of planktonic organisms as bioindicators of environmental quality is increasing and is considered a promising tool (Hemraj et al., 2017; Zebral et al., 2021). More importantly, alteration in planktonic communities can pose a risk to the whole trophic web (Figueiredo et al., 2020; Guidi et al., 2016; Turner, 2004).

    • Impact of barge movement on phytoplankton diversity in a river: A Bayesian risk estimation framework

      2021, Journal of Environmental Management
      Citation Excerpt :

      Due to their central role in the aquatic food chain (Borics et al., 2014; Das Sarkar et al., 2019a), they are recognized as the key natural indicators of biological assessment of aquatic ecosystem (Parmar et al., 2016). Tiny plankters—being extremely sensitive to external perturbation in an aquatic ecosystem (Xiao et al., 2019 and references therein)—are used for the change detection of ecological imbalance (Wang et al., 2019; Hemraj et al., 2017; Lemley et al., 2016) and environmental anomolies (Ajani et al., 2020; Righetti et al., 2019). It is, therefore, of significant importance to measure those natural and human-induced ecological stress on phytoplankton for the benefit of ecosystem sustenance (Abirhire et al., 2016; Baggio et al., 2020; Häder and Gao, 2015).

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text