Does socially responsible investment equity indexes in emerging markets pay off? Evidence from Brazil
Highlights
► We assess the performance of the mainstream SRI equity index in emerging markets. ► We employ a dynamic filtering analysis based on a modified state-space market model. ► Ethical investors can do good while not scarifying performance in bullish markets. ► The recent financial crisis led investors to take riskier, less profitable portfolio.
Introduction
Demand for integrating social and environmental concerns in financial markets was supplied by the introduction of different mechanisms for socially responsible investment (SRI). This approach, also known as ethical investment or sustainable investment (Renneboog et al., 2008), considers factors related to the environment, society, and human rights, in addition to traditional financial issues, thus allowing investors to match their investment strategy with their ethical values (Domini, 2001). Although SRI emerged in the middle of the last century, it has come into prominence largely within the past two decades (Fowler and Hope, 2007). During this period, SRI has ceased to be a niche activity and has become a core factor for mainstream investors in developed countries (Statman, 2006).
As a report from EUROSIF (2010a) emphasizes, “Total SRI Assets under Management (AuM) in Europe have reached €5 trillion, as of December 31, 2009, whereas they represented close to €2.7 trillion in 2005.” In the United States, SRI has increased in terms of dollars invested by 1200% between 1995 and 2009, resulting in a current share of about 10% of the SRI assets in the AuM on that market (EUROSIF, 2010a). The great development of this non-conventional investment approach was mainly originated by demand from institutional investors, through the mainstreaming of environmental, social, and governance principles in financial services, and by external pressures from the major nongovernment organizations (NGOs) worldwide (EUROSIF, 2010a).
This steep growth in SRI worldwide has stimulated the interest of academics and practitioners in conducting research on SRI performance (Fowler and Hope, 2007). Previous studies have mainly focused on measuring the risk-adjusted returns of several SRI assets, investment or pension funds, or SRI equity indexes in developed countries (Fowler and Hope, 2007). Although emerging markets have been a mainstream research area in the management and business agenda, thus far there has been little interest in SRI performance research in emerging countries. This lack is even more remarkable when considering that, according to the International Finance Corporation's1 (IFC) claims, investor interest in SRI in emerging markets has gained momentum over the past decade (IFC, 2011).
A global overview indicates that SRI has gradually evolved in emerging markets to represent over €200 billion2 (MERCER and IFC, 2009). This increase could be explained by the integration of corporate social responsibility (CSR) principles into financial markets, which is relevant to social and economic progress in emerging countries. More importantly, another relevant factor is the development of SRI equity indexes, which are non-conventional stock indexes of great relevance in this process because they have contributed to increased awareness and growing acceptance of the core concepts of sustainable investing among both companies and investors in these countries (IFC, 2011).
The most notable example of this process is the creation and development of the Brazilian Corporate Sustainability Index (BCSI) in Brazil in 2005. As an illustration, the amount of Brazilian retail SRI AuM grew from about €42 million in 2005 to over €700 million in 2009 (MERCER and IFC, 2009). This phenomenon has been similar to what occurred in the U.S. and Europe as a consequence of the appearance of the Dow Jones Sustainability Indexes (DJSI) and the FTSE4Good Indexes. However, although the U.S. and Europe SRI equity indexes' “revolution” has been widely studied (Schröder, 2007), similar studies have not been done in emerging markets.
To address this issue, this research explores, following traditional research on corporate social performance (CSP), the financial performance of the BCSI, thus contributing to the recent claims of the IFC and the World Bank that state that more research is required to further document the possible relationship between a company's sustainability performance and financial outcomes in emerging markets (IFC, 2011). Because the companies included in the BCSI are associated with higher levels of sustainability (see Appendix 3 for further details), this research should bring new insights about how companies' sustainability policies and strategies influence their financial performance. The analysis of BCSI performance could allow for the evaluation of how Brazilian companies manage risk and avoid costs (i.e., downside risks) and take advantage of sustainability-driven innovations in products, services, brands, and other intangibles (i.e., upside opportunities) (IFC, 2011).
Although there are SRI equity indexes in other emerging countries (see Appendix 1 for a complete list of the current SRI indexes in emerging markets), the BCSI was the second launched at the global level and the first of its kind in Latin America.3 Moreover, the amount of SRI AuM in Brazil, where SRI has great institutional backing, is higher than in other emerging countries like India, where retail investors dominate. This is of special importance because institutional investors, such as pension funds, insurance companies, bank trusts, and other diversified financial forms, have become increasingly influential with their cross-border portfolios in the global financial markets in the past 20 years (Wen, 2009). Institutional investors' activism on SRI should subsequently promote global sustainability.
This study of SRI in Brazil is also relevant because that market, as with other emerging economies, presents some factors that differ from established markets and that could have a significant impact on SRI performance. Examples, among others, are the rapid population growth, the potential of companies in developing countries to lead the world in CSR practices, the limited transparency in corporate governance (CG), the great role of the government in influencing the companies' governance structures, the high levels of social and income inequalities, the restrictions of the local capital market, the limited access of the firms to long-term sources of finance, and the deficiencies of ethics management.
The analysis of the BCSI financial performance is assessed by comparing it with its official benchmark, the Bovespa Index. This is of special importance because the only difference between the BCSI and the Bovespa Index is the social and environmental screening process. Therefore, the differences between these indexes' performance could only be attributable to their different social, environmental, and corporate governance performance, aspects that will make the results more robust than those shown in other papers that use non-official benchmarks to measure the financial performance of several SRI equity indexes worldwide.
To better understand the SRI performance phenomenon in Brazil, in this study the performance of the BCSI is compared to the results obtained by the other four most important equity indexes in the Brazilian market. The empirical analysis is carried out by using econometric techniques that have not been previously applied in the SRI field. The state-space market model will allow us to identify the stochastic process that drives the time-varying return and risk levels of the BCSI. This method will make it possible to identify the appearance of regime changes in the dynamics of the BCSI risk and returns in several market conditions (i.e., bull and bear market periods alike). This is of special interest because this research examines a timeframe that covers the financial downturn in late 2008. The implemented method will also allow us to obtain results that are expected to be of special relevance for improving the asset allocation process and the portfolio management procedures in controversial economic settings in emerging markets such as Brazil. Finally, this study is focused on a recent period (2006–2010) with a large increase in SRI at the global level, even as investors have attained a significant level of knowledge about SRI equity indexes, which will make the results more reliable and relevant for discussions.
The rest of this paper is organized as follows. The next section reviews the previous literature. Open questions on this topic are reviewed and the research hypotheses are presented. Section 3 introduces the theoretical econometric models to be applied, explains the sample selection methodology, and presents a descriptive study of the data. The results are shown in Section 4. Finally, conclusions, further discussions, and future research opportunities are in the last section.
Section snippets
Literature review and hypotheses
Research on SRI performance dates back to the 1970s (e.g., Moskowitz, 1972) and has grown significantly in recent decades. The common hypothesis in these studies is that SRI (e.g., an equity index or fund) should underperform its official benchmark given the two arguments: a) SRI portfolios are subsets of their official benchmark (Schröder, 2007) and b) the social and environmental screening processes restrict the investment universe, which leads to a reduction in risk-adjusted returns (Lee et
Econometric model
Most of the previous studies that focused on SRI funds or equity indexes used simple static econometric techniques, like computing Sharpe or Treynor ratios (Sauer, 1997, Schröder, 2007, Statman, 2000, Statman, 2006) or estimated the traditional/extended multifactor market model (DiBartolomeo and Kurtz, 1999, Garz et al., 2002). Studies that computed Sharpe and Treynor ratios may present biased estimates of risk-adjusted returns because the techniques used can be manipulated by strategies that
Model estimates: return and risk analysis
Table 2 shows the estimates of the RW, RC, and MR models described in the previous section. The model's goodness of fit has been measured through Akaike's information criterion (AIC), which is computed via the following expression:where log L refers to the likelihood function value in the maximum likelihood estimation (MLE) of θi, ln is the natural logarithm, n is the number of observations, and k is the number of parameters in the model. In order to evaluate the robustness of
Concluding remarks
This work aims to explore the financial performance of the mainstream SRI equity index in emerging markets in the Latin American context: the Brazilian Corporate Sustainability Index (BCSI). In order to assess the impact of the social and environmental screening process on the BCSI's performance, the latest results are compared with those of the official benchmark: the Bovespa Index. Thus, this research is expected to bring new insights about the implications of introducing CSR issues on
References (91)
- et al.
International evidence on ethical mutual fund performance and investment style
Journal of Banking & Finance
(2005) - et al.
Corporate governance in Brazil
Emerging Markets Review
(2010) - et al.
Financial integration, economic instability and trade structure in emerging markets
Journal of International Money and Finance
(2008) - et al.
Time-varying estimates of CAPM betas
Mathematics and Computers in Simulation
(1999) Time-varying conditional covariances in tests of asset pricing models
Journal of Financial Economics
(1989)- et al.
Estimating the performance attributes of Australian multi-sector managed funds within a dynamic Kalman filter framework
International Review of Financial Analysis
(2008) - et al.
Forecasting daily variability of the S&P 100 stock index using historical, realised and implied volatility measurements
Journal of Empirical Finance
(2005) - et al.
Measuring transparency and disclosure at firm level in emerging markets
Emerging Markets Review
(2002) - et al.
Risk aversion and skewness preference
Journal of Banking & Finance
(2008) - et al.
The impact of governance reform on performance and transparency
Journal of Financial Economics
(2011)
Socially responsible investments: institutional aspects, performance, and investor behavior
Journal of Banking & Finance
The impact of social-responsibility screens on investment performance: evidence from the Domini 400 Social Index and Domini Equity Mutual Fund
Review of Financial Economics
Volatility models of currency futures in developed and emerging markets
Mathematics and Computers in Simulation
Pressures from stakeholders hit Japanese companies
Long Range Planning
Measuring investment performance in a rational expectations equilibrium model
Journal of Business
Beyond dichotomy: the curvilinear relationship between social responsibility and financial performance
Strategic Management Journal
Corporate responsibility in emerging markets
Journal of Corporate Citizenship
Empirical evidence on corporate governance in Europe: the effect on stock returns, firm value and performance
Journal of Asset Management
Gain, loss and asset pricing
Journal of Political Economy
A capital asset pricing model with time-varying covariances
Journal of Political Economy
An empirical investigation of the possibility of stochastic systematic risk in the market model
Journal of Business
The form of time variation of systematic risk: some Australian evidence
Applied Financial Economics
Time-varying beta risk of Australian industry portfolios: a comparison of modelling techniques
Australian Journal of Management
A three-dimensional conceptual model of corporate social performance
The Academy of Management Review
Some further evidence on the stochastic properties of systematic risk
Journal of Business
The financial performance of the FTSE4Good indices
Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management
Corporate stakeholders and corporate finance
Financial Management
The eco-efficiency premium puzzle
Financial Analysts Journal
Managing Risk Exposures of Socially Screened Portfolios
Socially Responsible Investing: Making a Difference and Making Money
Do corporate global environment standards create or destroy market value?
Management Science
Mean–variance theory in complete markets
Journal of Business
Cannibals with Forks: The Triple Bottom Line of 21st Century Business
European SRI Study 2010
Emerging Markets Theme Report: Emerging Economies — Big Powerhouses with Large Potential
Beta as a random coefficient
Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis
Time stationarity of systematic risk: some Australian evidence
Journal of Business Finance & Accounting
Time-varying beta risk: an analysis of alternative modelling techniques
Journal of Business Finance & Accounting
The variation of economic risk premiums
Journal of Political Economy
The risk and predictability of international equity returns
Review of Financial Studies
Conditioning variables and the cross section of stock returns
Journal of Finance
Measuring fund strategy and performance in changing economic conditions
Journal of Finance
A critical review of sustainable business indices and their impact
Journal of Business Ethics
Strategic Management: A Stakeholder Approach
Ending the so-called Friedman–Freeman debate
Cited by (52)
Socially responsible investments: doing good while doing well in developed versus emerging markets?
2024, Research in International Business and FinanceBusiness, biodiversity, and innovation in Brazil
2023, Perspectives in Ecology and ConservationDoes a sustainability risk premium exist where it matters the most?
2022, Emerging Markets ReviewCitation Excerpt :Regarding the Large corporation partition, the Leaders portfolio's outperformance is beyond market exposure and typical anomalies and the Laggards portfolio significantly underperforms. These findings resonate with the positive relationship between sustainability and financial performance uncovered by scholars using sample with large market capitalization biases (Cheung et al., 2010; Cheung et al., 2012; Ortas et al., 2012; Sudha, 2015; Zou et al., 2019). As displayed, the sustainability risk premium for larger EME firms appears highly significant in the most advanced factor models.
Revisting conventional and green finance spillover in post-COVID world: Evidence from robust econometric models
2022, Global Finance Journal