Elsevier

Forest Ecology and Management

Volume 384, 15 January 2017, Pages 314-322
Forest Ecology and Management

Losing our palms: The influence of landscape-scale deforestation on Arecaceae diversity in the Atlantic forest

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2016.11.014Get rights and content

Highlights

  • We have quantitatively assessed the influence of reduced forest cover on palm assemblages.;

  • Forest cover at the landscape scale was a key predictor of palm diversity.;

  • Forest-interior species were negatively affected by reduced forest cover at the landscape scale.

  • Landscapes embedded within less than 40% forest cover harbored <10 out of 18 palm species.;

  • Restoration and the reintroduction of dispersers serve as important and urgently needed tools to safeguard palms.

Abstract

Understanding the effects of habitat loss on biodiversity has gained pronounced importance to inform conservation planning. Palms are a characteristic, important component of forest structure and the functionality of tropical forests, yet fragmentation-related studies have been poorly investigated in deforested landscapes. Here, we examine the influence of forest loss at the landscape scale on the entire palm community by evaluating species turnover at nine 16 km2 landscapes in the Brazilian Atlantic Forest with 9–71% forest cover. Additionally, we examine the influence of canopy openness at the local scale. We identified all live palms at the species level within 50 × 100 m forest plots at each site and classified species into categories based on their habitat occurrence (“forest-interior” and “open-area” species). The number of Arecaceae species and stems greatly declined with lower amounts of forest cover at the landscape scale, with the power-law model best explaining these relationships. The community composition was also affected by forest cover, in which higher species dissimilarity was observed among severely deforested landscapes. Additionally, our results showed that palm assemblages have been shaped by non-random processes, with forest-interior species being negatively affected by reduced forest cover at the landscape scale. Landscapes embedded within less than 40% forest cover harbored fewer than 10 palm species, mainly consisting of open-area forest species. Our study therefore demonstrates the pervasive influence of habitat loss on palm diversity in severely deforested landscapes in the Brazilian Atlantic Forest hotspot. Extensive management actions, including forest restoration and the reintroduction of animal dispersers, are urgent and serve as important tools to permit the successful recruitment, reproduction and establishment of palm species in the unique Atlantic Forest biome.

Introduction

Anthropogenic activities have modified tropical forest landscapes over centuries, leading to a cascade of species extinctions mostly driven by habitat loss at the landscape scale (Wright, 2010, Arroyo-Rodríguez et al., 2013). Along the eastern Brazilian coast, the Atlantic Forest is one of 35 global biodiversity hotspots, harboring a large number of endemic species that are threatened by forest loss (Martini et al., 2007, Myers et al., 2000). The Atlantic Forest was colonized as long ago as the 1500s, and it has been drastically transformed by the impact of human colonization. Currently, only 12% of the original forest cover remains intact in a mosaic of old growth and secondary forest stands (Ribeiro et al., 2009).

Habitat loss and fragmentation has led to several changes in landscape structure and configuration, greatly affecting population and community dynamics (Fahrig, 2003). For instance, forest loss alone has proven to drive plant and animal species extinctions at the landscape scale in tropical forests (Banks-Leite et al., 2012, Lima and Mariano-Neto, 2014, Morante-Filho et al., 2015). Additionally, the remaining patches are prone to decrease over time, as they are more isolated and very close to the forest edge and therefore susceptible to forest fragmentation effects; indeed, recent analyses have shown that 70% of remaining forest worldwide is within 1 km of a forest boundary (Haddad et al., 2015). However, empirical studies have demonstrated that habitat loss leads to more pervasive effects on forest biodiversity than habitat fragmentation per se (see Fahrig, 2003). Forest cover at the landscape scale can thus be considered a proxy for habitat loss, with non-linear relationships usually observed between the amount of habitat and diversity metrics for different forest biota (Pardini et al., 2010, Estavillo et al., 2013, Ochoa-Quintero et al., 2015). Species richness and compositional similarity in several tropical plant families have been strongly and positively related to forest cover, with forest sites surrounded by a greater amount of forest cover exhibiting a higher number of species and greater similarity than severely deforested landscapes (Lima and Mariano-Neto, 2014, Andrade et al., 2015). Additionally, forest loss is expected to cause alterations to local forest structure, leading forest patches to retain early successional local attributes, including a reduction in the overall basal area and increasing canopy openness (Rocha-Santos et al., 2016).

Arecaceae is an essential botanical family for tropical frugivorous animals because it provides a high abundance of fleshy fruits and seeds (Zona and Henderson, 1989, Galetti et al., 2013). Additionally, palms are key components of the forest structure, and many species have been extensively harvested by humans in the tropics (Scariot, 1999). This family is widespread in both intact and fragmented tropical forests and includes species well-adapted to a wide range of environmental conditions (Uhl and Dransfiled, 1987). South America is center of endemism for Arecaceae (Pintaud et al., 2008), with studies revealing that environmental factors such as humidity, temperature and soil fertility strongly control species distributions and are therefore likely to affect family richness and composition (Bjorholm et al., 2005, Bjorholm et al., 2006, Salm et al., 2007). Most Arecaceae forest species cope well with moderate levels of anthropogenic disturbance (Scariot, 2001, Bjorholm et al., 2005, Bjorholm et al., 2006), yet alterations including reduced seedling recruitment, competition with alien species, and disruptions to mutualistic relationships with fauna can modify population dynamics and community composition (Scariot, 1999, Wright and Duber, 2001, Fleury and Galetti, 2004). Specifically, in the Brazilian Atlantic Forest, although some species can be found in disturbed areas (e.g., Bactris spp.; Silva and Tabarelli, 2001), others are extremely sensitive to forest disturbance (e.g., Geonoma spp.) and usually exhibit reduced rates of population growth in altered environments (Svenning, 2001). As a result, habitat loss, fragmentation and palm harvesting have been considered the main threats to palms (Scariot, 1999, Tabarelli et al., 2004, Galetti et al., 2006). However, no study has investigated the community and species-specific responses to habitat loss until recently.

Here, we investigated the responses of the Arecaceae family to habitat loss at the landscape scale by evaluating species turnover in nine 16 km2 landscapes ranging from 9% to 71% forest cover in the Brazilian Atlantic Forest. Additionally, we examined the influence of canopy openness on local diversity patterns. We specifically evaluated the overall species richness, composition and abundance of palms to both a forest cover gradient at the landscape scale and canopy openness at the local scale. We also classified palm species based on their habitat type and occurrence preferences to assess the responses of both groups to a reduction in forest cover. We hypothesized that palm assemblages will become heavily affected by reduced forest cover and canopy openness, with contrasting groups (“open-area” and “forest-interior” species) responding oppositely depending on the forest cover gradient. We predicted that (i) species richness and composition similarity will increase in landscapes surrounded by a higher amount of forest cover, following similar responses from other floristic groups (Rigueira et al., 2013, Lima and Mariano-Neto, 2014, Andrade et al., 2015); (ii) the overall abundance will not be affected by forest cover, given that certain ecological groups will be favored by disturbance and consequently compensate for the reduction in others (Scariot, 1999, Andreazzi et al., 2012); (iii) species richness will also increase in areas exhibiting lower canopy openness, as these areas exhibit a better-structured canopy (Hilário and Toledo, 2016, Rocha-Santos et al., 2016); and (iv) palm species will exhibit different levels of vulnerability to habitat loss, with forest-interior species and stems greatly increasing in more forested landscapes, whereas open-area species and stems will decline in landscapes containing higher amounts of forest cover.

Section snippets

Study area

This study is part of the REDE SISBIOTA, a research network designed to investigate how landscape-scale forest loss affects patterns of regional biodiversity and processes in anthropogenic landscapes. In this context, Landsat TM images of southern Bahia from 2011 (orbits 215/70 and 215/71) were first digitalized and used to select landscapes. The obtained map was then divided into cells of 4 × 4 km (16 km2) to estimate the percentage of forest cover based on the sum of old growth and secondary

Results

We sampled 1472 adult individuals belonging to 18 species and 7 genera within 4.5 ha of forest sampled across all nine plots (Table S1). Each plot contained between 5 and 16 species (mean ± SD = 9.6 ± 1.8). The most frequent species among all surveyed landscapes was Bactris hirta (N = 8 plots), whereas Euterpe edulis was the most abundant, with 323 individuals distributed in six areas. Some species of Bactris and all species of Geonoma were more frequently recorded in landscapes exhibiting more forest

Discussion

Our study clearly demonstrates the erosion of Arecaceae richness, composition and abundance associated to reduced forest cover within landscapes of the threatened Brazilian Atlantic Forest. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first study to document the influence of reduced forest cover on an entire palm assemblage, a key ecological group characterizing the structure and composition of tropical forest (Scariot, 1999). Habitat loss has strongly influenced the structure of palm assemblages

Conclusions

Our study demonstrates the sharp collapse in palm diversity in severely deforested landscapes in the Brazilian Atlantic Forest, a key structural and functional plant component of tropical forests (Aguirre and Dirzo, 2008). Approximately 45 palm species belonging to 10 genera occur in the remaining Atlantic Forest hotspot (Lorenzi et al., 2004), with 18 recorded at our studied site in southern Bahia, including the threatened Syagrus botryophora (Noblick, 1998) and one of the most economically

Acknowledgments

The present study represents publication number #22 of the REDE SISBIOTA, funded by the Brazilian National Council for Scientific and Technological Development (CNPq; 563216/2010-7) and the Universidade Estadual de Santa Cruz (Propp 00220.1100.1039 and 00220.1100.1095). We are grateful to all landowners who enabled us to work on their properties and to all field assistants, especially Rafael Chaves and Carol Cornélio. Funding for Tamiris L. S. Oliveira and Adrielle Leal during this study were

References (64)

  • C.S. Andreazzi et al.

    Increased productivity and reduced seed predation favor a large-seeded palm in small Atlantic Forest fragments

    Biotropica

    (2012)
  • V. Arroyo-Rodríguez et al.

    Plant β-diversity in fragmented rain forests: testing floristic homogenization and differentiation hypotheses

    J. Ecol.

    (2013)
  • C. Banks-Leite et al.

    Unraveling the drivers of community dissimilarity and species extinction in fragmented landscapes

    Ecology

    (2012)
  • C. Banks-Leite

    Using ecological thresholds to evaluate the costs and benefits of set-asides in a biodiversity hotspot

    Science

    (2014)
  • A.S. Barfod et al.

    Twenty-five years of progress in understanding pollination mechanisms in palms (Arecaceae)

    Ann. Bot.

    (2011)
  • S. Barot et al.

    Reproductive plasticity in an Amazonian palm

    Evol. Ecol. Res.

    (2005)
  • M. Benchimol et al.

    Edge-mediated compositional and functional decay of tree assemblages in Amazonian forest islands after 26 years of isolation

    J. Ecol.

    (2015)
  • S. Bjorholm et al.

    Environmental and spatial controls of palm (Arecaceae) species richness across the Americas

    Glob. Ecol. Biogeogr.

    (2005)
  • S. Bjorholm et al.

    Historical legacies in the geographical diversity patterns of New World palm (Arecaceae) subfamilies

    Bot. J. Linn. Soc.

    (2006)
  • B.M. Bolker

    Ecological Models and Sats in R

    (2007)
  • G.R. Canale et al.

    Pervasive defaunation of forest remnants in a tropical biodiversity hotspot

    PLoS One

    (2012)
  • M.J. Crawley

    The R Book

    (2007)
  • C. Estavillo et al.

    Forest loss and the biodiversity threshold: an evaluation considering species habitat requirements and the use of matrix habitats

    PLoS One

    (2013)
  • L. Fahrig

    Effects of habitat fragmentation on biodiversity

    Annu. Rev. Ecol. Evol. Syst.

    (2003)
  • D. Faria et al.

    Bat and bird assemblages from forests and shade cacao plantations in two contrasting landscapes in the Atlantic Forest of Southern Bahia, Brazil

    Biodivers. Conserv.

    (2006)
  • J.M.V. Fragoso et al.

    Seed-dispersal and seedling recruitment patterns by the last Neotropical megafaunal element in Amazonia, the tapir

    J. Trop. Ecol.

    (2000)
  • G. Francesco Ficetola et al.

    Ecological thresholds: an assessment of methods to identify abrupt changes in species-habitat relationships

    Ecography

    (2009)
  • G.W. Frazer et al.

    Gap Light Analyzer (GLA), Version 2.0: Imaging Software to Extract Canopy Structure and Gap Light Transmission Indices from True-Colour Fisheye Photographs, Users Manual and Program Documentation

    (1999)
  • M. Galetti et al.

    Seed survival and dispersal of an endemic Atlantic forest palm: the combined effects of defaunation and forest fragmentation

    Bot. J. Linn. Soc.

    (2006)
  • M. Galetti

    Functional extinction of birds drives rapid evolutionary changes in seed size

    Science

    (2013)
  • P.R. Guimarães et al.

    Fleshy pulp enhances the location of Syagrus romanzoffiana (Arecaceae) fruits by seed-dispersing rodents in an Atlantic forest in south-eastern Brazil

    J. Trop. Ecol.

    (2005)
  • N.M. Haddad

    Habitat fragmentation and its lasting impact on Earth’s ecosystems

    Sci. Adv.

    (2015)
  • Cited by (36)

    • Conserving dominant trees in human-modified landscapes at the Lacandon tropical rainforest

      2022, Biological Conservation
      Citation Excerpt :

      Most studies testing this hypothesis have used simulation models, and the empirical approaches have been focused on animals (see Swift and Hannon, 2010; Shennan-Farpón et al., 2021). Studies assessing extinction thresholds in plants are scarce, and most of them focus on tree taxonomic groups or assemblages (Rigueira et al., 2013; Mascarenhas and Mariano-Neto, 2014; Rocha-Santos et al., 2016, 2017; Benchimol et al., 2017; Wies et al., 2021). To our knowledge, only two studies have approached this issue on tree populations, one with eight temperate species (from Ilex, Fagus, Quercus, Pinus genera) from Spain (Montoya et al., 2010), and another with the tropical arboreal palm Euterpe edulis (Leal et al., 2021).

    • Plant diversity conservation in highly deforested landscapes of the Brazilian Atlantic Forest

      2021, Perspectives in Ecology and Conservation
      Citation Excerpt :

      The landscape-divergence hypothesis, postulated by Laurance et al. (2007), states that differential human disturbances among forest remnants, such as the different degrees of reduction of local richness (patches) after habitat loss, can lead to differential trajectories of vegetation succession. Those disturbances may increase the compositional and functional differentiation of communities in fragmented landscapes, leading to high beta diversity between patches in a landscape (Benchimol et al., 2017; Sfair et al., 2016). Along with understanding communities' structures along landscapes, it is also important to understand the historical transformations that habitat patches and biodiversity have been submitted to (Molin et al., 2017).

    • Forest fragmentation and defaunation drive an unusual ecological cascade: Predation release, monkey population outburst and plant demographic collapse

      2020, Biological Conservation
      Citation Excerpt :

      Forests fragmentation disrupts habitat continuity and changes abiotic conditions of forest remnants (Kapos et al., 1997; Laurance, 1991), and leads to myriad changes in populations and communities of plants and animals (see reviews in Laurance et al., 2018; Malhi et al., 2014), as well as disruptions of species interactions (Hobbs, 1993; Aizen and Feisinger, 1994; Galetti and Dirzo, 2013). Most ecological studies of plants in fragmented forests have sought to understand how fragmentation affects plant community metrics, with an emphasis on differential susceptibility of species depending on life-history and response to light availability (Kapos et al., 1997; Scariot, 2001; Benchimol et al., 2017). In contrast, few studies have focused at the population level, and even fewer have used rigorous demographic analyses (but see Bruna et al., 2009) to illustrate plant responses.

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text