Plastic ingestion by Procellariiformes in Southern Brazil
Introduction
Plastics are strong, light objects that can float on the ocean surface (Morris, 1980) and are often found in the stomach contents of a variety of albatrosses and petrels (Procellariiformes) (Huin and Croxall, 1996, Fry et al., 1987). Two classes of plastic are most found in Procellariiformes (Ryan, 1987): plastic pellets and fragments. Pellets are an intermediate stage in the manufacturing process of plastic (Colton et al., 1974), which are lost during manufacturing or transportation. These objects enter the marine ecosystem either directly or through drainage systems and are spread throughout the oceans on currents (Furness, 1983). Plastic fragments are small pieces broken off from larger items (fishing buoys, buckets and bottles), which are either discarded or lost at sea by fishing boats and other types of vessels (Merrell, 1980). Other ingested anthropogenic items include toys, polystyrene, monofilament lines, rubber and plastic tape (Robards et al., 1995).
In the Northern Atlantic, Procellariiformes are the birds that are most affected by the pollution of plastic particles (Moser and Lee, 1992), harmed through the digestion of these items due to the inability to regurgitate them (Furness, 1985b, Azzarello and Van Vleet, 1987). Plastic particles can remain in the ventriculus for months or even years before being completely eliminated (Furness, 1985a, Ryan, 1988).
Studies carried out on the extent of the effects of plastic ingestion by birds suggest that there may be a reduction in digestive capacity caused by the reduction in functional volume of the proventriculus and ventriculus, leading to a loss of energy reserves for migration and nidification (Connors and Smith, 1982, Furness, 1983, Furness, 1985b, Ryan, 1988). Other harmful effects are also cited, such as intestinal obstruction and ulcerations (Bourne, 1976, Bourne and Imber, 1982), blockage of gastric enzyme secretion (Azzarello and Van Vleet, 1987) and absorption of organochlorine adsorbed by the plastics (Carpenter et al., 1972, Ryan et al., 1988), which can cause reproductive failure and death (Azzarello and Van Vleet, 1987, Ryan et al., 1988, Lee et al., 2001).
Approximately 40 species of Procellariiformes from the Northern and Southern hemispheres use Brazilian waters as a feeding area during migration season (CBRO, 2006). Anthropogenic factors such as fisheries and marine pollution threaten these species, which are of great conservation interest due to the steep decline in their populations in recent decades (Croxall et al., 1998, Croxall and Gales, 1998, Ryan, 1998).
In the present study, we first evaluated the presence of plastics in the digestive tract of Procellariiformes incidentally caught by longline fisheries as well as beached birds in Southern Brazil. We then assess the differences in plastic ingestion between beached birds and birds killed by fisheries and test the hypothesis that the presence of plastic may lead to a decrease in food ingestion by seabirds.
Section snippets
Methodology
A total of 193 birds, including 59 Black-browed albatrosses (Thalassarche melanophris), 27 Atlantic Yellow-nosed albatrosses (T. chlororhynchos), 41 White-chinned petrels (Procellaria aequinoctialis), 9 Spectacled petrels (P. conspicillata), 18 Great shearwaters (Puffinus gravis), 25 Manx shearwaters (P. puffinus), 9 Atlantic fulmars (Fulmarus glacialoides) and 5 Cory’s shearwaters (Calonectris diomedea), were collected between 1994 and 2005 by the team of the Museu Oceanográfico do Vale do
Results
Plastic objects were found in 38.3% (N = 74) of the birds sampled, principally fragments, pellets and lines. Only 7.2% of these birds (N = 14) had no food items in their digestive tracts.
The average number of plastics did not exceeds the average number of prey found in proventriculus and ventriculus for most species (Fig. 2). Exceptions occurred for Manx shearwater and Antarctic fulmar in which plastics amount to approximately 83% and 54%, respectively, of the total items (plastic and prey).
Discussion
Among seabirds, Procellariiformes have the highest incidence of ingested plastic particles (Bourne, 1976). Young and adult albatrosses are able to regurgitate indigestible material found close to the nest (Clarke and Prince, 1981, Clarke et al., 1981), but there are no reports of this ability for petrels (Furness, 1985a). In most petrels, a narrow constriction between the proventriculus and the ventriculus prevents particles to be regurgitated, and these birds can accumulate dozens of solid
Acknowledgments
We thank Jules M.R. Soto (Museu Oceanografico do Vale do Itajaí) for providing samples and the Fundação Universidade Federal do Rio Grande (FURG) for institutional and logistic support. The Brazilian Research Council (CNPq) provided a Ph.D. Grant to F.I. Colabuono.
References (38)
- et al.
Plastic pellets collected by a prion on Gough Island, central south Atlantic Ocean
Marine Pollution Bulletin
(1982) - et al.
Oceanic plastic particle pollution: Suspected effect on fat deposition in Red Phalaropes
Marine Pollution Bulletin
(1982) - et al.
Concentration of polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs) in beached resin pellets: Variability among individual particles and regional differences
Marine Pollution Bulletin
(2005) - et al.
Ingestion of plastic debris by Laysan albatrosses and Wedge-tailed shearwaters in the Hawaiian Islands
Marine Pollution Bulletin
(1987) Plastic particles in three Procellariiform seabirds from the Benguela Current, South Africa
Marine Pollution Bulletin
(1983)Plastic particle pollution: Accumulation by Procellariiform seabirds at Scottish Colonies
Marine Pollution Bulletin
(1985)Ingestion of plastic particles by seabirds at Gough Island, South Atlantic Ocean
Environmental Pollution (Series A)
(1985)- et al.
Polystyrene spherules in the Severn Estuary–a progress report
Marine Pollution Bulletin
(1976) - et al.
Contamination of polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs) in sediments from Kyeonggi Bay and nearby areas, Korea
Marine Pollution Bulletin
(2001) Accumulation of plastic litter on beaches of Amchitka island, Alaska
Marine Environmental Research
(1980)
Plastic debris in the surface waters of the South Atlantic
Marine Pollution Bulletin
Persistent organic pollutants carried by synthetic polymers in the ocean environment
Marine Pollution Bulletin
Increasing frequency of plastic particle ingestion by seabirds in the subarctic North Pacific
Marine Pollution Bulletin
The incidence and characteristics of plastic particles ingested by seabirds
Marine Environmental Research
Effects of ingested plastic on seabird feeding: Evidence from chickens
Marine Pollution Bulletin
Plastic ingestion and PCBs in seabirds: is there a relationship?
Marine Pollution Bulletin
Incidence of plastic in seabirds from the tropical pacific, 1984–91: Relation with distribution of species, sex, age season, year and body weight
Marine Environmental Research
Plastic cups found in fish
Marine Pollution Bulletin
Marine birds and plastic pollution
Marine Ecology Progress Series
Cited by (76)
Cory's shearwater as a key bioindicator for monitoring floating plastics
2024, Environment InternationalMicroplastic in clams: An extensive spatial assessment in south Brazil
2024, Marine Pollution BulletinBeached seabirds as plastic biomonitors in Brazil from the Beach Monitoring Project of the Santos Basin (PMP-BS)
2024, Marine Pollution BulletinInterspecific variability in plastic ingested by Procellariiformes off the Uruguayan coast
2023, Marine Pollution BulletinAnthropogenic debris ingestion in a tropical seabird community: Insights from taxonomy and foraging distribution
2023, Science of the Total Environment