Demography of the pet dog and cat population on the island of Ireland and human factors influencing pet ownership
Introduction
In the past, veterinary and government interest towards pets in both the Republic of Ireland (ROI) and Northern Ireland (NI) (subsequently referred to as Ireland) was limited to the health and wellbeing of individual animals only. More recently, however, there has been increasing recognition of the positive effect of pets on their owners’ mental and physical wellbeing (Yarnell et al., 2003), the importance of pet-associated problems, such as bite injuries (O'Sullivan et al., 2008), pollution and zoonotic disease (Stirling et al., 2008). There is considerable international research about the human–animal bond and its effect on human health (Beck and Meyers, 1996, Virues-Ortega and Buela-Casal, 2006, Cutt et al., 2007, Shuler et al., 2008, Knight and Edwards, 2008). The interest of both the Irish government and veterinary organisations in Ireland, on the control and regulation of pets, especially dogs, has been heightened with increasing contact between pets and people.
Published data on aspects of domestic pet demographics are available from several countries, including Australia (Baldock et al., 2003), the USA (Nassar et al., 1984, Patronek et al., 1997, AVMA, 2007), Canada (Leslie et al., 1994), Italy (Slater et al., 2008b), Brazil (Serafini et al., 2008) and Zimbabwe (Butler and Bingham, 2000). These studies were conducted using a range of methodologies, including telephone interviews, both locally (Serafini et al., 2008, Slater et al., 2008b) and nationally (Baldock et al., 2003, AVMA, 2007), and mailed surveys (Leslie et al., 1994). Butler and Bingham (2000) used dog population pyramids to illustrate the age distribution of dogs in the population, as did Baldock et al. (2003) to present the age distribution of cats in Australia. In the USA, it was reported that 37.2% and 32.4% of households own at least one dog and one cat, respectively (AVMA, 2007). In several studies, from Australia (Baldock et al., 2003), the USA (Nassar and Mosier, 1980) and Canada (Leslie et al., 1994), pet ownership has been linked to household demographics, including the presence of children in the household.
There is very little published information about the demography of domestic pets on the island of Ireland. Most is limited to ongoing market research for use by the pet food industry (Mintel Reports Academic, 2004), although some data are available from animal welfare groups (ISPCA, 2008). These data represent an interesting picture of the Irish pet population: market research has suggested a decline in pet population during 1998–2004 (Mintel Reports Academic, 2004), whereas animal welfare groups have highlighted a consistent problem of overpopulation (ISPCA, 2008).
In the literature, many demographic studies have underpinned programmes to manage pets (dogs in particular) with respect to the control of disease, including rabies (Butler and Bingham, 2000, Matter et al., 2000). Others have used demographic studies to predict the usage of veterinary services (Leslie et al., 1994, Matter et al., 2000, McGreevy et al., 2002) and future pet population trends (Baldock et al., 2003). With this in mind, the aim of this study was to describe the demography of the pet population in Ireland, and to identify human factors influencing pet ownership.
Section snippets
Reference population and unit of interest
The reference population included all human households with a landline phone number in Ireland. Variably, the human household, the eligible participant (see below) and the pet dog or cat were the unit of interest. For the purposes of this survey, we defined a pet dog as a dog that was being fed by the household and considered a pet by the eligible participant. A pet cat was defined as a cat that was both fed by the household and allowed into the house.
Household selection
A sampling frame of random digit dialling
Study enrolment
In total, attempts were made to contact people at 105,803 different telephone numbers in ROI and NI. Of these, 98,309 proved unsuccessful, because the numbers were inactive (30,611), there was no pickup or the phone was linked to a fax machine or business (67,339), or the eligible respondent did not fit the quota criteria (359). Further, there were 5991 refusals on pickup and 253 respondents who quit at some stage of the questionnaire. The final study number was 1250 eligible respondents.
The households
Discussion
Ireland is principally a dog-owning population, with a clear preference for dog over cat ownership in our survey population (35.6% versus 10.4% of households owning dogs and cats, respectively). The situation is somewhat different to reports from other countries, including the UK [22% dogs, 18% cats (PFMA, 2007)], the USA [37.2% dogs, 32.4% cats (AVMA, 2007)], and Italy [33% dogs, 15% cats (Slater et al., 2008b)]. The differences between UK and Ireland are particularly interesting, given the
Conclusion
This is the first study to provide insights into the demographics of the pet dog and cat population on the island of Ireland, and of human factors influencing Irish pet ownership. Differences have been observed in the level of pet dog and cat ownership in Ireland, compared with other countries where similar data are available. A number of factors affect pet ownership, in particular the presence of school children in households. The study has identified areas for further research, in particular
Acknowledgements
The authors thank Boyd Jones for his assistance, Amárach for conducting the computer-assisted telephone interviews, and the UCD School of Agriculture, Food Science and Veterinary Medicine for their financial support towards the project.
References (37)
- et al.
Dog ownership, health and physical activity: a critical review of the literature
Health Place
(2007) - et al.
Modeling the effect of sterilization rate on owned dog population size in central Italy
Prev. Vet. Med.
(2007) - et al.
Study of the dog population and the rabies control activities in the Mirigama area of Sri Lanka
Acta Trop.
(2000) - et al.
Repeatability of a telephone questionnaire on cat-ownership patterns and pet-owner demographics evaluation in a community in Texas, USA
Prev. Vet. Med.
(2008) - et al.
Cat and dog ownership and management patterns in central Italy
Prev. Vet. Med.
(2008) - et al.
Free-roaming dogs and cats in central Italy: public perceptions of the problem
Prev. Vet. Med.
(2008) 2005–2006 APPMA National Pet Owners Survey
(2005)U.S. Pet Ownership & Demographics Sourcebook 2007
(2007)- et al.
Estimated and predicted changes in the cat population of Australian households from 1979 to 2005
Aust. Vet. J.
(2003) - et al.
Health enhancement and companion animal ownership
Annu. Rev. Public Health
(1996)
New animal legislation urgently needed, says group
Target Group Index
Demography and dog–human relationships of the dog population in Zimbabwean communal lands
Vet. Rec.
Census 2006 Principal Demographic Results
Dog control figures
Pet ownership in rural Northern California (El Dorado County)
J. Am. Vet. Med. Assoc.
Telephone Survey Methodology
Survey Methodology
Cited by (90)
An assessment of the owned canine and feline demographics in Chile: registration, sterilization, and unsupervised roaming indicators
2024, Preventive Veterinary MedicineA survey of acquisition and animal-related factors leading to microchipping and neutering of dogs and cats in Portugal
2023, Journal of Veterinary BehaviorCat and dog predation on birds: The importance of indirect predation after bird-window collisions
2021, Perspectives in Ecology and ConservationCitation Excerpt :In addition, there are tools that can help prevent direct cat predation, such as belled collars (Gordon et al., 2010), collars with sonic devices (Nelson et al., 2005), the Birdsbesafe, https://www.birdsbesafe.com/ (Pemberton and Ruxton, 2020) and CatBibs (https://www.catbib.com.au/) anti-predation collars (Hall et al., 2016, 2015). Since cats with outdoor access can easily move between the yards and gardens of neighboring households (Kays and Dewan, 2004), leading to their owners having limited control over their behavior (Downes et al., 2009), these tools could be very useful as they do not depend on the presence of the pet owner. However, their effectiveness could vary (Ruxton et al., 2002; Woods et al., 2003) and some of them are still being tested (Mori et al., 2019).
Translational oncotargets for immunotherapy: From pet dogs to humans
2021, Advanced Drug Delivery ReviewsZoonotic parasites associated with predation by dogs and cats
2023, Parasites and Vectors