A critical view on the eco-friendliness of small hydroelectric installations
Introduction
All hydroelectric power projects are sources of renewable energy but the larger versions of such projects are not counted among renewable energy sources because, in the general perception, large hydropower projects (LHPs) are not ‘clean’ while other renewables are. Small hydropower projects (SHPs), which include minihydel, microhydel and picahydel units, are considered sources of renewable energy because they are perceived as the ‘clean’ and ‘green’ alternatives to LHPs. Driven by this perception, governments of several countries provide subsidies and other incentives for the promotion of small hydro, even as large hydro is denied that kind of patronage and is subjected to much more intense pre-licence scrutiny.
Interestingly, till as recently as in mid 20th century, LHPs had a much more favourable image than is commanded by SHPs at present. LHPs had appeared to be the cleanest of all energy sources, as ‘totally clean’ as the sunlight is when it is used directly for obtaining heat or light. Hydropower appeared even more virtuous than sunlight for the crucial reason that whereas sunlight is intermittent, hydropower is continuous. Hydropower had yet another distinguishing feature: its use seemed to provide numerous benefits over and above energy production. The very long roaster of the virtuesof cleanliness, dependability, and versatility of hydropower as were perceived thenincluded the following:
- 1.
It revolves round the use of one of the world's most benign, inexpensive, and abundant fluids: water.
- 2.
It utilizes water in a totally non-destructive fashion. After hydropower generation, the water remains intact and reutilizable with hardly any deterioration in its quantity or quality.
- 3.
It utilizes two basic forms of energysolar heat and force of gravitywhich both are ‘carbon free’, perpetual, and inexhaustible (in foreseeable geological time).
- 4.
It transforms these carbon-free forms of energy to electricity which, again, is carbon free and ‘clean’ in that sense.
- 5.
It is linked to creation of reservoirs by damming rivers at suitable sites. At one time, the reservoirs themselves had appeared to be a great boon. They promised to utilize the river flow to the maximum. They stored water when it was available in excess, for use in times when the flow in the stream was too lean or totally stopped. Additionally, reservoirs promised to control floods, promote fisheries, facilitate irrigation, recharge underground aquifers, and ensure uninterrupted public water supply.
- 6.
Unlike thermal power plants no gaseous or flyash emissions were seen coming out during the production of hydropower. And, unlike nuclear power plants, there were no radioactive wastes to contend with.
- 7.
The reservoirs had an additional virtue no other type of power plants possessed: they made an aesthetically pleasing sight. Wast spans of clean water always have great recreational value: reservoirs provided it. Indeed very many large reservoirs continue to be highly sought-after tourist spots.
During the middle of the 20th century, when only a few LHPs existed in the world outside North America and a few West European countries (WCD, 2000), and before anything was known about their downside, LHPs appeared paragons of virtue; the ultimate gift of technology. Everything about LHPs appeared unquestionably good, and more, while nothing negative came to mind. There was such a euphoria about LHPs that Jawaharlal Nehru, the then Prime Minister of India and a major global personality associated with the Non Aligned Movement, was moved deeply enough by the sheer appeal‒then felt‒of LHPs to call them the ‘temples of modern India’ (Chari et al., 2005a, Chari et al., 2005b, Abbasi and Abbasi, 2012).
Riding on such faith and euphoria, developing courtiers committed large chunks of precious public money in LHPs in particular and dams in general. There was such a spurt in dam building that by the end of the 20th century the world had over 45,000 large dams, recording an staggering 9-fold increase over the figure that had existed in 1949 (WCD, 2000). The world did not just build more and more dams, it built bigger and bigger dams, too.
As the number and the size of LHPs increased, there was also an increase in the reports of their adverse impacts. By the late 1970s LHPs had begun to lose their pre-1949 sheen, a process which became quicker with each passing year as public opposition to new LHPs became more and more strident. All over the world more and more environmental activists began going up in arms whenever a hydroelectric power project was planned. In India, several persons even offered to lay down their lives through the Gandhian means of fast-unto-death in protest against hydel projects (Chari et al., 2005a). By now the tide has turned so completely that efforts are on to even dismantle some of the existing hydroelectric dams, especially in the USA (Huesemann, 2006, Hoffert-Hay, 2008) where there is little dam-building since 1976 after an exponential growth in this sector between 1916 and 1976 (Kosnik, 2008).
Section snippets
Environmental impact of LHPs
LHPs have now become the most closely scrutinized and extensively studied of power generation options vis a vis environmental impacts, alongside thermal power plants (Abbasi and Abbasi, 2000, Abbasi and Abbasi, 2012, Chari et al., 2005a, Chari et al., 2005b, Nilsson et al., 2005, Poff et al., 2007, WCD (WORLD Commission On Dams), 2000). There is general agreement that large hydroelectric projects cause major adverse environmental impacts (IEA, 1998, International Energy Agency (IEA), 2000, WCD
The inconsistency among different countries on the definition of SHP
Small-scale hydropower systems, generally called ‘small hydro’, essentially possess the same characteristics as large hydro, with a difference only of scale. Within the umbrella term of small hydropower project (SHP) are included ‘mini’, ‘micro,’ and ‘pico’ hydel systems with power generation capacity ranging from 100 MW to as little as a 5 kW. These systems essentially result from the dispersal of hydel power generation. The dispersal is achieved either by constructing a number of low-head dams
Summary and conclusion
It is widely believed that whereas large hydropower projects (LHPs) cause significantly adverse impacts on the environment, small hydropower projects (SHPs) are either free of adverse impacts or generate only minor impacts which are easy to ameliorate. Driven by this belief, governments of numerous countries have been encouraging and subsidizing SHP development. SHPs are also, by-and-large, being subjected to much less stringent pre-project environmental impact assessment and post-project
Acknowledgement
Authors thank the Ministry of Water Resources, Government of India, for support.
References (85)
- et al.
The likely adverse environmental impacts of renewable energy sources
Appl Energy
(2000) - et al.
The expertise and the practice of loss prevention in the Indian process industry
Process Saf Environ Prot
(2005) - et al.
Small hydro and the environmental implications of its extensive utilization
Renew Sustain Energy Rev
(2011) - et al.
Renewable hydrogen: prospects and challenges
Renew Sustain Energy Rev
(2011) - et al.
Decarbonization of fossil fuels as a strategy to control global warming
Renew Sustain Energy Rev
(2011) - et al.
The return to renewables: Will it help in global warming control?
Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews.
(2011) - et al.
Mitigation and recovery of methane emissions from tropical hydroelectric dams
Energy
(2007) - et al.
RES technology transfer within the new climate regime: a “helicopter” view under the CDM
Renew Sustain Energy Rev
(2009) Working together: understanding the effects of small hydropower
Refocus
(2002)- et al.
The diversity of hydropower projects
Energy Policy
(2002)
Present situation and future prospect of hydropower in China
Renew Sustain Energy
The potential of water power in the fight against global warming in the US
Energy Policy
An overview of renewable energy in Spain. The small hydro-power case
Renew Sustain Energy Rev
Small hydro power: technology and current status
Renew Sustain Energy Rev
Life cycle assessment of a community hydroelectric power system in rural Thailand
Renew Energy
Achieving global environmental benefits through local development of clean energy? The case of small hilly hydel in India
Energy Policy
Discharge diversion in the Patía River delta, the Colombian Pacific: geomorphic and ecological consequences for mangrove ecosystems
J S Am Earth Sci
Life-cycle inventory for hydroelectric generation: a Brazilian cast study
J Clean Prod
Methane capture from livestock manure
J Environ Manage
Energy production and sustainable energy policies in Turkey
Renewable Energy.
Utilization of carbon-negative biofuels from low-input high-diversity grassland biomass for energy in China
Renew Sustain Energy Rev
Water quality modeling: A primer
International Journal of Chemical and Environmental Engineering Systems.
Water and wetlands
International Journal of Environmental Science and Engineering Research.
Is the use of renewable energy sources an answer to the problems of global warming and pollution?
Crit Rev Environ Sci Technol
Contribution of paddy fields to methane emissions and the strategies to control it: the Indian scenario
Int J Environ Sci Eng Res
Consequences of hydropower development in Central America: impacts of small dams and water diversion on neotropical stream fish assemblages
River Res Appl
An assessment of the small hydropower potential of sisakht region of Yasuj, World Academy of Science
Engineering and Technology.
Potential Impacts of Hydrokinetic and Wave Energy Conversion Technologies on Aquatic Environments
Fisheries.
Feasibility of intentional islanding operation with small hydropower plants
Contrasting impact of small dams on the macroinvertebrates of two Iberian mountain rivers
Hydrobiologia.
Renewable energy and hydropower utilization tendency worldwide
Renew Sustain Energy Rev
Extreme methane emissions from a Swiss hydropower reservoir: contribution from bubbling sediments
Environ Sci Tech
Neither small, nor green
The Hindu
Comparison of greenhouse gas emissions form an old tropical reservoir with those from other reservoirs worldwide
Verh Int Ver Theor Angew Limnol
Assessment of small hydropower potential using remote sensing data for sustainable development in India
Energy Policy
Greenhouse gas emissions from hydroelectric dams in tropical forests
Do hydroelectric dams mitigate global warming? The case of Brazil's Curuá-Una Dam
Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change.
Belo Monte Dam: a spearhead for Brazil's dam-building attack on Amazonia? GWS Discussion Paper 1210
Changes in atmospheric constituents and radiative forcing
Methane quashes green credentials of hydropower
Nature
Cited by (82)
A review on hydro energy
2023, Renewable Energy - Volume 1: Solar, Wind, and Hydropower Definitions, Developments, Applications, Case Studies, and Modelling and SimulationRecent development of nickel based chalcogenides for hydrogen generation
2023, Materials Today: ProceedingsDeath by a thousand cuts: Small local dams can produce large regional impacts in the Brazilian Legal Amazon
2022, Environmental Science and PolicyA review of how life cycle assessment has been used to assess the environmental impacts of hydropower energy
2022, Renewable and Sustainable Energy ReviewsFramework for a more balanced consideration of hydropower development through ecosystem services assessment
2022, Sustainable Production and ConsumptionCitation Excerpt :Hydropower allows us to reduce our dependence on fossil energy, but its large-scale engineering construction has impacts on the environment (Wang et al., 2022). Countries worldwide have different attitudes towards hydropower development (Premalatha et al., 2014). The U.S.A. and some European countries (e.g., Sweden, Spain, Portugal, the U.K.) have stopped developing large-scale hydropower projects and started demolishing dams (Connor et al., 2015; Magilligan et al., 2016).
The micropolitical life of energy projects: A collaborative exploration of injustice and resistance to small hydropower projects in the Wallmapu, Southern Chile
2022, Energy Research and Social ScienceCitation Excerpt :Latin American indigenous peoples also stress the social and cultural meaning that they attach to rivers in their resistance towards SHP’s [19,20]. Notwithstanding the above issues and the distrust that civil society holds towards public institutions leading the energy transition [37], Chilean authorities continue to promote SHPs as less invasive than large hydropower dams and as an eco-friendly solution to enhance people's livelihoods [13,34]. Consequently, SHPs are approved either with or without a process of proper consultation, ignoring community leaders’ demands for power, autonomy, and self-determination.
- 1
Concurrently Visiting Associate Professor, Department of Fire Protection Engineering, Worcester Polytechnic Institute, Worcester, MA 01609, USA.