- •
More than 12% of the watersheds of the Brazilian Amazon already have or are approaching natural forest cover below 30% and more than a third have below 80%.
- •
Regions of the Amazon already forest cover below the average of the Atlantic Forest.
- •
We propose learning policy lessons from the Atlantic Forest to avoid the same trajectory as the Amazon.
- •
They need to be implemented urgently to stop the route towards its tipping point, address the climate emergency and assure the provision of ecosystem services.
- •
There is room for expansion in the academic engagement with businesses in Brazil, notably in issues related to biodiversity and sustainability.
- •
To tackle existing issues: offsets, licensing, and private reserves are fronts for engagement between academia and businesses in Brazil.
- •
To tap into new opportunities: sustainable bioeconomy, access and benefit sharing, and environmental, social, and corporate governance are topics whereby academia-businesses partnerships in Brazil can innovate.
- •
A mindset shift in academia and corporations will be required to foster sustainable businesses from a biodiversity perspective.
- •
Limited Global South participation and parachute science hampers tropical ecology.
- •
Upgrades in equity, diversity and inclusion rooted in the Global South are essential.
- •
Tropical conservation practices must be led by local researchers and stakeholders.
- •
Recognition of science in the Global South may improve through outreach.
- •
International research must provide equitable workloads and recognition to Global South researchers.
- •
References are key to restoration, especially in highly threatened ecosystems.
- •
Optimal references connect conservation and restoration.
- •
Small remnants that serve as references can lead to landscape-scale benefits.
- •
A detailed habitat classification is needed for adequate protection and restoration.
- •
Ensuring optimal references protection will benefit future restoration initiatives.
- •
Colombia covers over half of key wintering areas for migratory birds in South America.
- •
Most of the migrants’ overwinter range overlaps with working landscapes.
- •
Priority national restoration/rehabilitation areas are ineffective to benefit migrants.
- •
Forest conservation needs actions involving vulnerable and minority groups.
- •
We evaluated 7 water-related ES in landscapes with different proportions between eucalyptus and natural forests.
- •
There is a threshold close to 20% of forest coverage below which ES supply tends to become unsustainable.
- •
The highest gain to the seven ES occurs in catchments with natural forest cover over 45%.
- •
Erosion control was the service most linked to natural forest decrease.
- •
Identifying and mapping strategic areas is a starting point for conservation and restoration actions.
- •
Different participator perspectives allow changes in the methodology originally adopted.
- •
The participatory approach provides highly effective and assessable mapping prioritization.
- •
Brazil has the highest number of threatened avian taxa.
- •
Taxa eligibility for ex situ conservation is not correlated to level of threat.
- •
Larger taxa with easily replicable diets are predominant in ex situ conservation facilities.
- •
Presence in traffic favors taxa eligibility for ex situ conservation plans.
- •
Ex situ conservation reach is constrained by the lack of experimentation and of risk-taking.
- •
Power lines are a major cause of bird mortality due to electrocutions and collisions.
- •
This threat has been poorly studied in South America.
- •
Scientific and grey literature suggest this threat is present in this subcontinent.
- •
A total of 85 bird species from 34 families affected by power lines were identified.
- •
More studies assessing bird mortality due to this threat in South America are needed.
- •
The KBA Standards may not be scalable to all biodiversity.
- •
If everywhere can be a Key Biodiversity Area, nowhere is “Key”.
- •
If any area is “Key” the assessment process is solely based on manageability.