Most cited
- •
High-resolution remote sensing data reveals 28%, or 32 million hectares (Mha), of native vegetation cover in the Brazilian Atlantic Forest.
- •
There are 7.2Mha of degraded riparian areas, of which 5.2Mha at least must be restored before 2038 by landowners for legislation compliance.
- •
Restoring this existing legal debt could increase native vegetation cover in the biome up to 35%.
- •
Reduction in patch size affects functional trait composition of bird communities.
- •
Functional richness is directly and positively related to habitat patch size.
- •
Large-bodied and large-beaked frugivores are most sensitive to patch size reduction.
- •
Loss of sensitive species potentially hinders seed dispersal for large-fruited trees.
- •
Conserving large inter-connected patches is key to sustaining ecological processes.
- •
The Brazilian protected area network plays a key role in biodiversity conservation.
- •
Systematic conservation planning determines the existing conservation gaps.
- •
Conservation gaps correspond to 16.5% of the Brazilian territory.
- •
Conservation gaps are unevenly distributed among the Brazilian biomes.
- •
The Brazilian protected area network should be further expanded.
- •
Ecology has witnessed a strong conceptual shift.
- •
Its not realistic to predict the future of ecosystems ignoring human being.
- •
Ecologists have sought to understand the consequences of more subtle human actions.
- •
The Niche Construction Theory can help to understand human influences on environment.
- •
Native species populations may become overabundant and cause serious harm.
- •
Super-dominant species are poorly considered in the scientific literature.
- •
We highlight 16 Brazilian plant species with extreme super-dominant behaviour.
- •
Human activities trigger super-dominance, which shall intensify with climate change.
- •
Scientists and decision-makers must work closer to identify and manage super-dominant species.
- •
The Brazilian Atlantic Forest and other biodiversity hotspots are rapidly urbanizing.
- •
The role of urban protected areas in safeguarding bird diversity is little known.
- •
Larger protected areas retain larger proportion of the regional bird species richness.
- •
Small areas, however, are also crucial to maintain the regional diversity.
- •
Legal-based birdwatching may help to protect birds in urbanizing regions.
- •
Aichis Target 11 has not been adequately met.
- •
Quality of the management of Conservation Units was poor for all indicators.
- •
The only biome properly covered by Conservation Units in Brazil is the Amazon.
- •
Areas of Environmental Protection offer poor protection and predominate in the system.
- •
The funds for management should be at least 3.4 times bigger than current budget.
- •
Brazil fought poverty, environmental destruction, and education shortfalls.
- •
Succeeding in social and environmental issues made Brazil a leader by example.
- •
Crisis resulted in drastic cuts of social and environmental funding in Brazil.
- •
Crisis is justifying a wider gap between science and policy in Brazil.
- •
To boost the engagement of people in decision-making is mandatory to defeat crisis.
- •
South Brazilian and North American tallgrass grasslands show botanical similarity.
- •
Fire appears to have a similar ecological role in both regions.
- •
Fire as ecological process and conservation tool is undervalued in Brazil.
- •
Brazilian grassland conservation might benefit from North American experiences.
- •
Comparative ecological studies will improve our understanding of grassland ecology.
- •
Dogs are not resident, invading the area from surrounding areas.
- •
Domestic dogs are distributed in the whole area with 0.74–1.37individuals/km2.
- •
Distance from Park's limits or presence of paved roads do not affect dogs’ occurrence.
- •
Dogs’ activity was diurnal and native animals with the same pattern would probably be more susceptible to dog's impacts.
- •
Management strategies should consider the engagement of local people to be successful.